Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling.

BACKGROUND Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). We analyzed the effects of ventricular decompression by continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow LVADs on myocardial structure and function in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-one patients who underwent LVAD implantation as bridge-to-transplant were analyzed (pulsatile-flow LVAD: group P, n=31; continuous-flow LVAD: group C, n=30). Serial echocardiograms, serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and extracellular matrix biomarkers (ECM) were compared between the groups. Myocardial BNP and ECM gene expression were evaluated in a subset of 18 patients. Postoperative LV ejection fraction was greater (33.2±12.6% versus 17.6±8.8%, P<0.0001) and the mitral E/E' was lower (9.9±2.6 versus 13.2±3.8, P=0.0002) in group P versus group C. Postoperative serum levels of BNP, metalloproteinases (MMP)-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-4 were significantly lower in group P compared with group C (BNP: 552.6±340.6 versus 965.4±805.7 pg/mL, P<0.01; MMP9: 309.0±220.2 versus 475.2±336.9 ng/dL, P<0.05; TIMP4: 1490.9±622.4 versus 2014.3±452.4 ng/dL, P<0.001). Myocardial gene expression of ECM markers and BNP decreased in both groups; however, expression of TIMP-4 decreased only in group P (P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium using pulsatile devices is more effective as indicated by echocardiographic parameters of systolic and diastolic LV function as well as dynamics of BNP and ECM markers. Therefore, specific effects of pulsatile mechanical unloading on the failing myocardium may have important implications for device selection especially for the purpose of bridge-to-recovery in patients with advanced HF.